Mesorat%20hashas for Niddah 8:29

אם כן תהא דיה שעתה

[a period of uncleanness from] the time of her observation of the flow should suffice!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It being obvious that the flow began only at that moment, for if it had begun earlier she (cf. prev. n.) would have been aware of the fact. Why then should her period of uncleanness extend backwards for twenty-four hours? An objection against Rabbah. ');">²⁸</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Niddah 8:29. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.